Google's Search, Development and Enterprise Discussions

Google on Ulitzer

Subscribe to Google on Ulitzer: eMailAlertsEmail Alerts newslettersWeekly Newsletters
Get Google on Ulitzer: homepageHomepage mobileMobile rssRSS facebookFacebook twitterTwitter linkedinLinkedIn


Google Authors: Kevin Jackson, Shelly Palmer, John Cahill, Pankaj Taneja, Harry Trott

Related Topics: CEOs in Technology, Twitter on Ulitzer, Government News, Facebook on Ulitzer, Marketing and Sales, Google, The Social Media Guide

News Feed Item

Newspapers Canada Finds Uneven FOI Performance in Audit

TORONTO, ONTARIO -- (Marketwire) -- 09/27/11 -- A total refusal to release contracts in Winnipeg, Quebec's denial of basic accountability information about top officials' spending, passenger manifests for Ontario's executive aircraft on which names deleted after six months and the federal government's stubborn refusal to release data in a useful form are just some of the findings of the Newspapers Canada sixth annual National Freedom of Information Audit, which tests the openness of governments across the country.

The 2011 audit is the largest in the history of the project, with 354 requests on 40 topics sent to all three levels of government as well as to crown corporations and hospitals.

"Because many of the requests were identical, the audit offers a unique comparison of different FOI handling across the country," said Newspapers Canada CEO John Hinds. "The audit shines a light on uneven practices that are not in line with the spirit of the legislation."

At each level of government there were several identical requests. Institutions were not told they were being audited. The audit grades institutions on the speed and completeness of their responses.

Audit Highlights:

--  How your request for information is handled depends on where you live in
    Canada. Of the provinces/territories, Nova Scotia, P.E.I. and Yukon were
    the fastest responders, while B.C. was the slowest. Federal institutions
    completed 61 per cent of requests within 30 days, compared to 50 per
    cent the year before.


--  Ontario was a special focus this year, (part II of the report) receiving
    64 requests (other provinces received 17 each, up from five last year).
    Also requests were filed to the top volume ministries and agencies for
    logs of all general records FOI requests filed since April 1, 2007. This
    allowed for the analysis of more than 30,000 requests. Media requests in
    Ontario accounted for only one per cent of the total but made up 23 per
    cent of the requests considered contentious. Ontario received a D grade
    for completeness of disclosure.


--  A request for a social media policy for employees resulted in Saskatoon,
    Yarmouth and Corner Brook all releasing their policies on the same day
    the request came in. Transport Canada and National Defence took two
    months each to complete processing of exactly the same request, and
    Environment Canada took three months before denying access to half of
    what it held.


--  In B.C., an unusual approach to request handling allowed requests that
    actually took 38 calendar days to complete went into the records books
    as being released in full in just 21 (or 15 working days as B.C. does
    the calculation).


--  The City of Winnipeg said contracts are confidential, while the nearby
    city of Brandon released a contract in full.


--  Municipalities in Alberta, Manitoba and Newfoundland earned an A for
    speedy disclosure while Nova Scotia municipalities received an F
    (although the provincial ministries earned an A).


--  For completeness, municipalities in Nova Scotia and the Yukon got an F,
    while the provincial level in Manitoba and Nova Scotia each earned an A.


"There is reason for hope that the system is improving due to speedy handling of requests by municipal officials, and a refreshing openness about municipal contracts in places such as Saskatchewan, but there is much room for improvement in many areas," said Hinds. "Ontario continues to charge a fee more often than any other jurisdiction for what is public information. Officials should consider following New Brunswick's lead and removing fees altogether."

The project was led by Fred Vallance-Jones, assistant professor of journalism at the University of King's College in Halifax. A student audit team submitted and tracked the requests from January to May 2011.

To view the audit, visit the Newspapers Canada website - http://www.newspaperscanada.ca/public-affairs/freedom-information.

Cities audited in 2011:

Alberta: Banff, Calgary, Edmonton, Lethbridge
BC: Nanaimo, Nelson, Vancouver, Victoria
Manitoba: Brandon, Stonewall, Winnipeg
New Brunswick: Fredericton, Moncton, Saint John
Newfoundland: Corner Brook, St. John's
Nova Scotia: Bridgewater, Cape Breton, Halifax, Truro, Yarmouth
NWT: Yellowknife
Ontario: Cornwall, Hamilton, Ottawa, Sudbury, Thunder Bay, Toronto, Windsor
PEI: Charlottetown
Quebec: Laval, Montreal, Quebec, Sherbrooke
Saskatchewan: Moose Jaw, Regina, Saskatoon, Yorkton
Yukon: Whitehorse

CONFERENCE CALL
John Hinds and Fred Vallance-Jones will talk about the audit and answer
questions
    DATE: September 27, 2011
    TIME: 11 a.m. (EDT)
    To call in, phone 1-866-512-0904
    Participant code: 431-9481

About Newspapers Canada

Newspapers Canada is the voice of Canada's daily and community newspaper industry. We promote the positive reputation of newspapers as an essential medium that benefits all Canadians, and as an effective vehicle for advertisers. We act as a vigorous champion of journalistic freedom and democratic reform and a valued source of industry information, trends and best practices.

Contacts:
Newspapers Canada
John Hinds
CEO
416-923-0858
[email protected]

University of King's College
Fred Vallance-Jones
(902) 402-8202
[email protected]

Newspapers Canada
Susan Down
Managing Director, Dailies
416-923-3567 x 231
[email protected]

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.